Re: Accessing user memory and minor page faults


Alexei Starovoitov
 

On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:40:21PM -0700, Gianluca Borello wrote:

You are correct, and my point was: since it is indeed possible to
serve a page fault without ever sleeping if there's no contention over
the locks and the page is already in memory somewhere (like in the
case I just described above, and like you said "it needs to sleep in
*some* cases"), why not taking advantage of these cases?
this issue was discussed at Plumbers and it seems there may be
a solution in sight. The work on 'speculative page faults' will
remove mm->mmap_sem in favor of srcu approach with sequence numbers
and we will be able to do find_vma() and vma->vm_ops->access() from
the non-sleepable context.
From bpf program point of view it probably be a new helper
bpf_probe_read_harder() ;) or something that will try normal
pagefault_disabled read first and if it fails will try
srcu_read_lock+vma->access approach.

Join iovisor-dev@lists.iovisor.org to automatically receive all group messages.