Re: [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value


Daniel Borkmann
 

On 06/16/2016 10:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 06/16/2016 12:55 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
+ EM_BPF = 0xeb9f, // Linux kernel bpf virtual machine
Great, can that be assumed the final magic e_machine number for the ELF
header that eBPF loaders can check for as well then (I do like 0xeb9f ;))?
I'm quite fond of 0xeb9f myself. ;-)

I have sent a message to both registry@... and registry@....
We'll see if that produces a response within a reasonable time frame. Failing
that, I'm tempted to just use 0xeb9f forever.
Yeah, sounds good!

Join iovisor-dev@lists.iovisor.org to automatically receive all group messages.