Welcome IOVisor Devs! This list is now open :)

Hello, iovisor-dev, Since this list just got set up, we'll play a bit of catch-up. First, if you haven't yet and would like to, please sign yourself up on http://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iov

Hello, I am Ashhad. A CS major undergraduate student. I am researching on iOVISOR, specifically on it's real life performance. I want to ask that Is it possible to have netlink communication between e

Hello Ashhad, It would be good to know what type of use case you have in mind for transferring data between user and kernel space, then perhaps I can answer more accurately. For instance, if using the

Hello Brenden, Thanks for your helpful replay. These are actually interesting things you mentioned I will surely look into these. Using SOCKET was my initial idea but I want to know that are they full

Ashhad, At this moment, you can look at the following two tests: Test #10: py_test_brb Test #11: py_test_brb2 It does not really punt the packet to user space. But the example punts the packet to rout

Hello iovisor-dev, Today was the biweekly IOVisor TSC/Dev call, for which the meeting minutes are included below. We primarily covered status for the previous two weeks. === Meetups === On 2015/9/21,

G'Day, I wrote a long script that, as a basic example, tries to do the following in C: int trace(struct pt_regs *ctx) { bpf_trace_printk("%d", ctx->ax); return 1; } Then consumes both the printk outpu

There can always be a python thread for this, but I don't believe there would be a way to correlate the two events, since they'll come in at different times and with different chances of being rate li

I dug through the list and realized that the actual integer I want to emit in this case -- which is not ctx->ax like my simple example, but is the thread blocked time -- can already be exposed as PERF

All, IO Visor project got three 40 minutes slots at the upcoming Collaboration Day at the OS Summit in Tokyo, Japan at the end of the month (Thursday 10/29). If you (or your company) are attending and

more details » IOvisor TSC & Dev Members call Agenda : 1) Update on IOVisor Module design and progress on top of eBPF engine 2) discussion about YAML model for Control Plane of IOVisor Modules and the

This event has been changed. more details » IOvisor TSC & Dev Members call Changed: Agenda : 1) Update on IOVisor Module design and progress on top of eBPF engine 2) discussion about YAML model for Co

This event has been changed. more details » IOvisor TSC & Dev Members call Changed: Agenda : 1) Update on IOVisor Module design and progress on top of eBPF engine 2) discussion about YAML model for Co

This event has been changed. more details » IOvisor TSC & Dev Members call Changed: Agenda : 1) Update on IOVisor Module design and progress on top of eBPF engine 2) discussion about YAML model for Co

This event has been changed. more details » IOvisor TSC & Dev Members call Changed: Agenda : 1) Update on IOVisor Module design and progress on top of eBPF engine 2) discussion about YAML model for Co

Hi Assume more than few maybe at the OpenStack event. Can we skip this meeting? Thx Uri (“Oo-Ree”) C: 949-378-7568 -----Original Appointment-----

agree, I can't make it tomorrow either, but next week in Tokyo is a good place to meet.

Hi All, is a Virtual Box VM a good environment to start compiling and investigating the various BPF *networking* examples at iovisor.github.com ? Regards, Billy.

Hi Billy, Yes, a VBox will work just fine to develop in. I personally test in both physical and kvm environments. AWS also works. So far, most of the examples are self-contained on a single machine, r