This group is locked. No changes can be made to the group while it is locked.
Date 1 - 1 of 1
[llvm-dev] [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value
Jacques Pienaar <jpienaar@...>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Daniel Borkmann via llvm-dev <llvm-dev@...> wrote:
On 06/16/2016 10:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 06/16/2016 12:55 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
+ EM_BPF = 0xeb9f, // Linux kernel bpf virtual machine
Great, can that be assumed the final magic e_machine number for the ELF
header that eBPF loaders can check for as well then (I do like 0xeb9f ;))?
I'm quite fond of 0xeb9f myself. ;-)
I have sent a message to both registry@... and registry@....
We'll see if that produces a response within a reasonable time frame. Failing
that, I'm tempted to just use 0xeb9f forever.
Yeah, sounds good!
I got a response from registry@... (registery@... forwards to there I believe). It took about 6 months to get a number assigned.
|1 - 1 of 1|